Histories of the Future Perfect

Post Photo Courtesy of Amazon.com

Post Photo Courtesy of Amazon.com

Histories of the Future Perfect

-Poems Reviewed By Kendra Bartell

Ellen Kombiyil’s debut poetry collection, Histories of the Future Perfect, is framed by two epigraphs: the first, from Stephen Hawking, roots us in the science of the book—

In this approach, a particle does not have just a single history…instead, it is supposed to follow every possible path in space-time.

The second comes at the end of the collection, taken from William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying

An is different from my is.

These two epigraphs form a perfect circle to enclose Kombiyil’s fascinating collection—a book fully concerned with itself and its placement in this moment in time, in this iteration of existence. The poems circle and loop, making Mobius strips, and swirls. As the title suggests, the poems in this collection explore time and timing, iterations of the same moment, of the same thoughts.

“Erratum,” the first poem in the collection, is an example of Kombiyil’s shifting narrative voice and majestic control of language as she muses on experience:

others remember differently of course
their echoes are echoes rippling
person to person silence not silence
but a form of
not speaking up a form of
held back in the throat what could unravel

A moment may seem and be described in one way by one person, but could be conceived by another as an “imagined something/else.” We are not privy to what the moment contains, but instead we are given an imagined “swirl of dust kicked up in sunlit/dusk.” We remain in this made-up space of possibility, perhaps one of the moment’s “every possible path[s] in space-time,” calling back to Hawking’s epigraph. The poem moves at a quick pace, each clause slightly running into the next while maintaining its rhythm.

Experience and re-experience are central motifs in the collection, most notably manifest in a series of poems titled “Recurring 1,” “Recurring 2,” and “Recurring 3.” Each of these poems ends a section of the book, and each revisits the same core word bank, with slight changes between them. The anchor of the poem is a dream in which the speaker remembers a “you,” a night spent dancing, and the fact that the you has left.

In “Recurring 1,” the series’ first iteration, we experience “an old dream manufactured people/once known,” in which the mysterious “you” is an “apparition in the frame/of someone else’s photo” and is “here & not.” On the first encounter with this poem, the reader has no referential experience, and is therefore unsuspecting as yet of any changes to come.

In “Recurring 2,” we see some of the same core words found in “Recurring 1,” the first iteration; however, there is a literal spaciousness to this next iteration of the poem here not found in the first—namely, more: there is white space on this the page, absen#1. The reader’s experience with the first iteration is triggered by these same words; however, the tone and shape of the poem are now different. The narrator is more distant, more aware of “what comes next,” for both the speaker and the reader. This distance manifests itself the poem’s white space between lines. More visceral descriptions draw the reader into this frontier: “we will/chip a fetal pig’s skill chip it eggshell/soft chip chip chip it in biology.” Through unflinching description readers realize the narrator is fixated on physical sensations of being left behind.

In “Recurring 3,” the final iteration, the narrator is in an “empty dark space.” In this poem, as in the first two, there is a sense that the reader is being kept away from certain key details, allowed access only to hints of the poem’s underlying moment. For the reader, it’s a pleasant unknowing, however, to hit the same dream on three different paths. Each iteration feels vividly dire, full of sadness and longing and loss. They call to mind a processing of grief, that iterative machine where you dwell, and dwell, and dwell on something of which your mind can’t quite make sense.

These “Recurring” poems illuminate another motif in the book: how we process and store memories, and the way we revisit those stored experiences. In “Recurring 2” we read

Tracing synapse
nerve how memory gets stored flash
flash

These changes in mind happen in that flash: first we have the experience, then we create the memory, and then we remember, or re-experience. “Instructions for Breathing Underwater 1” is another example of this motif:

Separate time from when you were young,
time an open egg in your palm…To know something bodily is to know it forever.
It
s never certain at what point youll remember.

The experience of time and memory creates a feeling in the body that can draw one into a memory at any moment. Kombiyil here shows a mastery in blending different levels of discourse—familiar, friendly, scientific. The shifting language, blended with a constant familiarity and openness, allows the reader to be drawn into this experience of time without question. One reads the poem and nods yes, yes, Ive felt this way, too. Kombiyil’s deft control of register is also impressive. In one swift movement, we see her switch between direct address to the reader and internal musing:

Aside: its been years since Ive swum in a lake

                  (distinct smell of lake, recalled anywhere)

                  through dank water to the wooden floating dock.

Later in the poem, we see the entrance of more scientific language:

Move with the instability

                  Of electrons, sometimes wave, sometimes particle.

                  APPENDIX A: OCEANS/RIVERS/LAKES

                  (CAUTION: Slipper moss)

As the poem moves through its course, we see the three registers blend together as in a current, swirling, each one creating another level of resonance with the reader.

Kombiyil’s collection has a whirlpool effect as you read, drawing you close, spinning you out, then bringing you in again. At times, you may get swept away in the beauty of the language and the meaning might spin past you. Or you may be completely wrapped up in the narrative arc of a poem and not notice a swift internal rhyme or switch of register. Let that be okay. Let that be the reading of each particular poem, and—as the first poem says—you will be there “watching it become what was.”

***

Post Photo Courtesy of Amazon.com

#FlashTag: Rural

#FlashTag: Rural

Monologging.org invites you to help create collaborative flash fiction. The following picture-inspired story, needs to be completed by Saturday, August 22nd. Every day, different authors around the world will be selected to contribute the next line. Find out how to submit your twist to the evolving plot by visiting the #FlashTag Submission Guidelines… Submit Free!

Photo by Jeffrey F. Barken

Photo by Jeffrey F. Barken

 

 

#FlashTag: Rural

 

 

#FlashTag @monologging “Sunny skies in Jackson County, High of 93. Winds E at 15 miles per hour. Corn’s coming up.”

#FlashTag@ Many dry, dusty fields. Many great men & some not so great, walked the cold dark rural South roads the year 1842

#FlashTag@ “You still reading that history book, Jim? You read it maybe a million times… why’re you living in 1842?”

#FlashTag@ “Billy, for shame. Our great grandfather settled here. I reckon he’s spinning in his grave thinking we’ll forget.”

#FlashTag@ “We moved his grave.” Signs marking plots for development stood where the grandfather once lay. “He stood here…”

#FlashTag@ Silence reigned. “Next book I read will be science fiction,” Jim said. “History don’t grasp the strangeness.”

 

 

 

 

Think you’ve got the next line to the story? Submit your #FlashTag response via Submittable!

Need a little help getting started? Click here to read: #FlashTag Examples

 

#FlashTag: Mayday!

#FlashTag: Mayday!

Monologging.org invites you to help create collaborative flash fiction. The following picture-inspired story, featuring photography by Monologging artist, Ronaldo Aguiar, needs to be completed by Saturday, August 15th. Every day, different authors around the world will be selected to contribute the next line. Find out how to submit your twist to the evolving plot by visiting the #FlashTag Submission Guidelines… Submit Free!

Photo by Ronaldo Aguiar

Photo by Ronaldo Aguiar

 

 

#FlashTag: Mayday!

 

 

#FlashTag @monologging @ Heat flooded the capsule. “Mayday!” Aldo dialed distress & gasped for air.

#FlashTag @diranasaurus The control panel flashed. Aldo slammed buttons and rotated dials, but to no effect.

#FlashTag@onthesidetreas1 Can’t keep my eyes open. The light it’s beautiful. Is that YOU? I’m closing my eyes. “Aldo, hang on!”

#FlashTag@ Aldo pulled the escape hatch & jettisoned. There was atmosphere. His parachute opened, yanking him into the clouds.

#FlashTag@ @ Aldo drifted over a green, steaming fog. Visibility decreased as he descended. There seemed no bottom.

#FlashTag@ @ Soft landing. Haze. Figures emerge, helmet drops. “YOU?” “Believe it. Let’s go.” “Where?” “Save dad.”

 

 

 

 

 

Think you’ve got the next line to the story? Submit your #FlashTag response via Submittable!

Need a little help getting started? Click here to read: #FlashTag Examples

Great Grandfather

Screen Shot 2015-08-04 at 6.53.25 PM

Post Photo Courtesy of http://www.legendaryauctions.com/

Great-Grandfather

-Story by Jack Smiles

“Great-grandfather, tell me about the home run you hit off Warren Spahn. And tell me about the time you drank beer with Mickey Mantle.”

“Home run, no. Mantle, no. Beer, yes. And the beer was half the damn reason I didn’t.”

“Didn’t what, Great-grandfather?”

“Didn’t hit a homer off Warren Spahn or anybody else. Didn’t make it, damn it. And stop calling me Great-grandfather.”

“But you did, Great-grandfather. You made it to the major leagues, and you hit three home runs—and one was off Warren Spahn. It says so right here in my baseball encyclopedia: Stanley Bendis, born Benton, Pennsylvania, height 5’11”, weight 170, bats left, throws…”

“Yeah—blah, blah, blah. Don’t it say, too, I only got in fifty games and batted .220?”

“Thirty-nine and .207. But Great-grandfather, you were a professional ballplayer for eleven years.”

“Professional? I coulda made more in the mines. Why do you think they call them the minors?”

“Very funny, Great-grandfather. But still—you were a major-leaguer. You played in Baker Bowl. It’s the coolest thing.”

“Cool? Oh, brother. And stop calling me Great-grandfather.”

“What should I call you, then?”

“Pops. Stanley. I don’t know.”

“The little kids call you Pops. I’m big now, Great-grandfather.”

“Yeah, you are big. Well, tall, anyway.”

Jacob visited his great-grandfather at his grandmother’s house every week, sometimes two or three times. He always lugged his baseball encyclopedia which showed Great-grandfather’s Major League record and printout of his great-grandfather’s minor league record. Great-grandfather sat at the kitchen table with a beer while Jacob loomed over him and peppered him with questions.

What was it like in San Antonio? Did you ride the rails all over California? Do you know you led the New England League in stolen bases in 1948? Do you know you were teammates with Jimmy Piersall in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and what was it like there?

Jacob’s great-grandfather spit nails. At least that’s what he said: “Answering your questions is like spitting nails.”

One day Jacob brought Brandon with him. “He’s my friend from school and he wants your autograph.”

“Autograph? What kind of cockamamie stuff has Jacob been telling you?”

“He said you played in the major leagues, sir.”

“So did a million other guys—why don’t you get their autographs?”

Brandon turned red and squirmed. “I don’t know any of them other guys,” he said.

“Huh, what’d you say, kid?”

“Great-grandfather,” said Jacob, “please?”

Brandon handed Great-grandfather a ball and pen and he signed it.

Later Jacob asked Great-grandfather to come to school for show-and-tell.

Great-grandfather moaned. Jacob thought he might really spit nails. “I don’t want no damn kids staring at me like I’m some kinda freak.”

Jacob’s eyes grew moist. Great-grandfather couldn’t stand to see Jacob cry, so it was off to school the next day.

Jacob stood in front of his classmates. Great-grandfather sat in the teacher’s chair. Miss Redding stood by the door.

“This is my great-grandfather Stanley Bendis, and he played baseball in the major leagues for the St. Louis Browns and the Philadelphia Phillies. You can ask him any questions.”

Hands shot up.

“My dad says baseball players are a bunch of millionaires and half of them are on dope. Are you a millionaire?” Max asked.

“A millionaire? I’m lucky I got a pot to piss in.”

The kids giggled. Miss Redding flushed.

“Sorry. No—I’m no millionaire. Ballplayers today are, but I played a long time ago. I’m not even a thousandaire.”

The kids laughed at that.

“And I’m not on dope.”

They laughed again.

They asked him how old he was. Eighty-nine.

They asked him who was the best player he ever saw, and who was the worst.

Ted Williams, and himself. They asked him if he played Little League. There was no such thing in his time. They asked him what he did after baseball. “Roofs,” he said.

“Roofs?” asked Miss Redding.

“Yeah, I put a roof on half the houses in this town and tarred the one above our heads right now.”

“Tell us about the first time you batted in the major leagues,” Jacob said.

“Can’t remember.”

Jacob turned to his notes. “Baker Bowl, September 7, 1950, against Bobby Shantz of the Philadelphia A’s.”

Great-grandfather paused and cleared his throat. The room went quiet. “Probably struck out,” he said.

Jacob laughed, the kids all laughed, and Great-grandfather laughed with them. This was the first time Jacob could remember seeing his great-grandfather laugh.

***

#FlashTag Bulletin

#FlashTag: Bulletin

Monologging.org invites you to help create collaborative flash fiction. The following picture-inspired story, needs to be completed by Saturday, August 8th. Every day, different authors around the world will be selected to contribute the next line. Find out how to submit your twist to the evolving plot by visiting the #FlashTag Submission Guidelines… Submit Free!

Photo By Jeffrey F. Barken

Photo By Jeffrey F. Barken

 

 

#FlashTag: Bulletin

#FlashTag @monologging  Amy tore a stub from the flyer, eyed the cost & the piano teacher’s #. She crumpled the paper.

#FlashTag@ Amy recognized the piano teacher’s name. “No way I’m calling that guy…what a sleaze.”

#FlashTag@ Wait! This is all I’ve ever wanted. I’m not giving up so easily this time, I’ll find a way.

#FlashTag@ Amy knew she was seeking excuses. She wandered through town until she came to the teacher’s door.

#FlashTag @monologging  Sweet melodies played inside. Amy knocked. No answer. She rang the bell. Nothing. She’d have to enter to learn…

#FlashTag @monologging  Amy crept through the salon. Gabe was playing Chopin. She touched his shoulders. “I knew you’d come,” he said.

 

 

 

Think you’ve got the next line to the story? Submit your #FlashTag response via Submittable!

Need a little help getting started? Click here to read: #FlashTag Examples

Big Screen Streaming: Mr. Holmes

Big Screen Streaming: Mr. Holmes

-by Roger Market-

The Sherlock Holmes we know and love often appears in movies and TV shows as a young detective at the top of his game. This trend isn’t just another manifestation of Hollywood’s obsession with youth and beauty; it actually makes sense, as the original books and stories have Holmes solving the bulk of his cases relatively early in life. How can the entertainment industry once again rejuvenate the indelible detective? There’s no point trying to make him any younger; it’s already been done. So in director Bill Condon’s Mr. Holmes, based on the 2005 novel A Slight Trick of the Mind, by Mitch Cullin, the character gets the opposite of a facelift, and the effect is refreshing.

At ninety-three years old, Holmes is feeble, irascible, withdrawn. He’s preoccupied with the unsolvable case that sent him into retirement some thirty years prior, the already incomplete details of which are escaping him in his old age. Sir Ian McKellen brings the appropriate brooding quality to the role. His Holmes is emotionally distant from everyone, including, notably, his live-in housekeeper, Mrs. Munro (Laura Linney), and her son, Roger (Milo Parker). Indeed, the only living creatures he really seems to care about are his bees.

Young Roger nonetheless idolizes Holmes, and the movie’s emotional core revolves around their relationship. Holmes is fond of the boy but is cold toward him. For example, when Holmes discovers that Roger has been in his study reading the story he’s been writing to try to make sense of his unsolvable case, the aged detective is upset that his privacy has been invaded. He reacts with hostility tempered by unexpected gentleness. His opposition thaws as he and Roger bond over a shared interest in solving the case. He even shares one of his tricks, telling Roger that when a man comes to see a detective, “it’s usually about his wife.”

Although Mr. Holmes isn’t a mystery film per se, viewers can certainly expect throwbacks and jokes about the original source material. Early in the film, for instance, the detective insists that fiction is worthless, and when asked about imagination, his response is classic Sherlock Holmes: “I’ve never had much use for imagination. I prefer facts.” He also reiterates, many times, the fictional nature of the stories written by his former partner, Watson. These statements collectively speak to the iconic character’s predilection for solving mysteries with facts, while at the same time, in the context of this particular adaptation, hinting at the cynicism he’s acquired in his twilight years. In fact, it’s exactly because of his advanced age, both mentally and physically, that the typical combination of mystery and action (à la 2009’s Sherlock Holmes) won’t work here. Instead, we watch as an elderly man wrestles with mistakes made in the pursuit of his passion: solving the mysteries of human nature. How far will he go to bring his uncrackable case to its proper end?

The movie’s resolution may surprise some viewers, and its depth may both sadden and delight. In his quest to solve the mystery, Holmes has to face the consequences of his own obsessive nature and to accept companionship before it’s too late. The final scenes offer heart-pounding tragedy and much-needed solace, and McKellen, Linney, and Parker are a phenomenal trio to the end. Viewers who enjoy Sherlock Holmes and are curious about what his twilight years might look like should definitely check out Mr. Holmes. It’s currently showing in a somewhat limited capacity, but each week brings new theaters into the fold. Check your local listings for details.

***

Post Photo Courtesy of en.wikipedia.org 

Memories & Demons

DSC_0051Memories & Demons

-Reporting by Sara Newman

Certain artistic elements are nearly universal crowd-pleasers, but photographer Kathy Curtis Cahill does not allow the restrictive standards of popular aesthetics to dim her personal vision. In her previous photography collections, “Culture of Beauty” and “Night Echoes,” Cahill scrutinizes popular ideas of beauty standards and consumer culture. In her latest collection, “Memories and Demons,” Cahill continues to subvert cultural norms by reinterpreting objects in which we should find comfort, tackling discomforting notions about humanity as she turns her lens to the world of childhood.

Cahill’s chiaroscuro style gives each photograph a muted darkness resonant more with the aesthetics of a Caravaggio than with typical contemporary art, yet the images possess a distinct cinematic quality, emphasized by thick, black frames. “Cathartic, unnerving and ultimately healing, the protagonists of Cahill’s photographic mini-dramas are dolls acting out bittersweet dreams and haunting nightmares,” Artists Corner Gallery curator, Phil Tarley, writes of the collection. No matter how unsettling the drama in the photographs may be, Cahill’s images retain a familiar quality, like snapshots of a bad dream or classic horror film.

Cahill’s work drew a small but dedicated audience on opening night, many of whom left with signed, leather-bound books of the photographs. The pieces are few in number but deeply evocative. The hyper-stylized photographs are eerily tinged with both nostalgia and nightmare. Tarley refers to the dolls’ world as one of “childhood wonder, fear, and trepidation,” expressed in the faces of the dolls and in the configurations of their bodies. Even more compelling, however, and perhaps somewhat unsettling, is how the photographs turn the viewer into a voyeur. The cracked, scratched, and discolored faces of the children are likewise unnerving, all the more so as we consider that these scars represent human neglect and the thoughtless shunning of our responsibility to the fragile and innocent.

Despite their disrepair, the porcelain-shell dolls possess a simple, timeless quality that begs the question of how artless play and innocent fantasies have degenerated in just a few decades into the synthetic, high-tech diversions we now see. The big-eyed, rosebud-mouthed dolls of Cahill’s photographs stand in stark contrast to the oversexed Bratz and Barbie dolls that line the shelves of toy stores today. The nostalgia in Cahill’s photographs is palpable; the dolls are a throwback to an era before most of Cahill’s fans were alive, and they are reminiscent of a time when a child owned and cared for just one, or maybe two, truly beautiful dolls that she could cherish forever—not roomfuls of flimsy plastic toys that end up in the garbage heap.

However discomforting one-eyed teddy bears and dolls gripping guns may be, in photographs with titles such as “Where’s Baby” and “Bully,” the images retain an honest sense of humanity that makes it difficult to look away and impossible to deny; they serve as necessary reminders of the need to value and protect the things we hold dear before they vanish into our culture of careless consumption.

Kathy Curtis Cahill’s latest photography collection, “Memories and Demons,” will be on display at Artists Corner Gallery from July 11 until August 8, 2015.

***

#FlashTag: Encampment

#FlashTag: Encampment

Monologging.org invites you to help create collaborative flash fiction. The following picture-inspired story, needs to be completed by Saturday, August 1st. Every day, different authors around the world will be selected to contribute the next line. Find out how to submit your twist to the evolving plot by visiting the #FlashTag Submission Guidelines… Submit Free!

DSC05172

Photo by Jeffrey F. Barken

 

 

#FlashTag: Encampment

 

#FlashTag @monologging  The army officer kicked the cans. “Damn it,” he said. “We’re too late.”

#FlashTag@ “Check every room! They’ve got to be here.” The room is dark, only a ray of sun shining through the window.

#FlashTag@ Three things happen at once. The sliver of light disappears, someone screams and everybody starts shooting.

#FlashTag@ A bullet bit the officer’s neck. He held the wound. Blood pumped between his fingers. He fell to his knees.

#FlashTag@ With his good arm, the officer crawled to a better vantage point. Men fell on both sides.

#FlashTag @itsjaykyall laughter echoed, shrill & splintered.

 

Think you’ve got the next line to the story? Submit your #FlashTag response via Submittable!

Need a little help getting started? Click here to read: #FlashTag Examples

 

Free to Live & Love

unnamed-5

Photo by Jimmy DeSana

Free To Live & Love

-Art Reporting by Sara Newman

Within a social echo chamber dominated by a self-reflective Internet, it’s too easy to reaffirm a belief in one’s goodness and the validity of one’s ideas. But if we truly hope to become better versions of ourselves each day, we need to push away from our screens, exit the echo chamber, and interact with those who will force us to consider if the stories we tell ourselves are true.

Luckily for art lovers in Los Angeles, OHWOW Gallery’s latest show, Queer Fantasy, presents such an opportunity. Curated by William J. Simmons, the exhibition brings the work of ten different artists together, challenging societal narratives about the homogeneity of the queer experience. The art pieces in the show not only engross viewer’s senses, but they also educate—the works showcased in Queer Fantasy “recount and preserve a frequently marginalized history of queer voices within contemporary art.”

While there is something undeniably playful about Leidy Churchman’s egg-topped, bacon-handled ceramic teapot, and Jimmy DeSana’s photograph of a smiling Debbie Harry set against a Pepto-Bismol-pink wall, Queer Fantasy attempts to showcase the “the idiosyncratic aesthetic of Queerness,” using art to challenge the all-too pervasive misconceptions about queer life as a spectacle of hairspray and glitter, thereby unseating the misplaced belief in a singular drive behind the creation of all queer art.

This intergenerational, multimedia show, with works from A.K. Burns, Leidy Churchman, Jimmy DeSana, Celeste Dupuy-Spencer, Mariah Garnett, Jacolby Satterwhite, David Benjamin Sherry, Jack Smith, A.L. Steiner, and John Waters, is at once lighthearted and self-serious. The mixture of black and white with bright pops of pink energizes the show while the individual pieces, with subversive titles like “You Good Dog,” “Submission,” and “Gay is Not Enough,” serve as “critical tool[s] for the reformulation of normative art histories.”

The focal point of the exhibition is an installation by experimental filmmaker Mariah Garnett. “Encounters I May or May Not Have Had with Peter Berlin” projects images from an old-school film projector onto a disco ball in the center of the gallery’s back room. While the low-hanging disco ball evokes images of flashy, glamorous queer culture, the true feat of the installation is the intricacy and beauty of the film refracted against the tiles of the ball and recast as polka-dot images against the white walls. The tiered vision of film strips connecting from projector to projector is so dazzling that you could be forgiven for failing to notice the fast-moving scenes in the dozens of thumb-sized images, but it is the integration of splendor and function that makes the disco-ball-as-projector so breathtaking.

Unconventional beauty and reimagined forms, however, are not limited to the projector room. Heterosexual masculine norms of the art world and the world at large are confronted and called into question as angrily scribbled drawings appear beside reimagined landscape portraits and rainbow-striped nudes. The art in Queer Fantasy is joyous and vibrant, yet each piece speaks to the artists’ need to reclaim spaces of their own in which to make their voices heard and their truths recognized.

While each artist clearly brings a unique aesthetic and personal vision to the show, with some pieces intended to dazzle and others meant to appall, the collective works of these ten artists present viewers with a painfully cohesive narrative of individual marginalization. There’s no intrinsic finger-pointing within the art, and yet the focus on micro-aggression and daily injustice against the queer community makes it hard for one to leave the gallery without a sense of obligation to be a better advocate.

Rather than offering easy self-affirmation, the pieces in Queer Fantasy force us to question the roles that we play—or fail to play—in creating and honoring alternative spaces in which individuals are free to thrive, uninhibited by social constructs and restrictions.

Queer Fantasy is on display from July 11 until August 15 at OHWOW Gallery in West Hollywood.

***

#FlashTag: Black Eye

#FlashTag: Black Eye

Monologging.org invites you to help create collaborative flash fiction. The following picture-inspired story, featuring photography by Monologging artist, Ronaldo Aguiar, needs to be completed by Saturday, July 25th. Every day, different authors around the world will be selected to contribute the next line. Find out how to submit your twist to the evolving plot by visiting the #FlashTag Submission Guidelines… Submit Free!

11647135_919221731475349_1729358201_n

Photo by Ronaldo Aguiar

 

 

 

 

#FlashTag: Black Eye

 

 

#FlashTag @monologging @ “Leave the gun,” Leo said. “They’ll frisk us before the card game.”

#FlashTag @itsjaykyall “You got an ace up your sleeve?” His partner, Nell, asked as they drove through the Lincoln Tunnel.

#FlashTag@diranasaurus “Naw,” Leo said, “Something better than an ace.”

#FlashTag@ They parked in Midtown. Behind a grocery, there was a black door. “Joker beats an ace,” Leo said. Nell knocked.

#FlashTag @monologging The black door opened to reveal a ratty card table. “This is the way the world ends, Nell.”

#FlashTag @NairobiCollins Two jokers shuffle through the door into a stacked game. Nell’s hand: hot. Leo’s sleeve: ready. Black eye: coming.

 

 

Think you’ve got the next line to the story? Submit your #FlashTag response via Submittable!

Need a little help getting started? Click here to read: #FlashTag Examples